<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
I'll have a look at that as soon as I can (probably next week)
<p>Thanks for reporting !
<p>What can easely be done is to check also the Filter_Powder component,
that was designed as a filter but acts as a general powder sample that
scatters everywhere. Then (using for instance the sample files *.dat given
in the version 1.6-ill) you can check the existence of powder lines at
expected angles.
<br>That would also be a good opportunity to look at the intensity scattered
by this compoennt. If you have some diffractometer data for simple powders
(the best would be to have one of these *.dat files), could you compare
the intensity of the simulated lines vs the measured one ?
<p>Any volunteer ?
<p>Emmanuel.
<p>"Gutmann, MJ (Matthias)" wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Hi,
<p> when using a single crystal
sample, it seems that Bragg's law has
<br>been incorporated
<br>as
<p> lambda = 2 * d * sin(2*theta)
<p>instead of
<p> lambda = 2 * d * sin(theta)
<p>Maybe worth checking whether this is the case.
<p>Matthias
<p>_______________________________________________
<br>neutron-mc mailing list
<br>neutron-mc@neutron.risoe.dk
<br><a href="http://neutron.risoe.dk/mailman/listinfo/neutron-mc">http://neutron.risoe.dk/mailman/listinfo/neutron-mc</a></blockquote>
<pre>--
What's up Doc ?
--------------------------------------------
Emmanuel FARHI, <A HREF="http://www.ill.fr/tas/people/Farhi.html">http://www.ill.fr/tas/people/Farhi.html</A> \|/ ____ \|/
CS-Group ILL4/156, Institut Laue-Langevin (ILL) Grenoble ~@-/ oO \-@~
6 rue J. Horowitz, BP 156, 38042 Grenoble Cedex 9,France /_( \__/ )_\
Work :Tel (33/0) 4 76 20 71 35. Fax (33/0) 4 76 20 76 48 \__U_/</pre>
</html>